CIVIL SOCIETY
1/26/09
Print this article
Email this article
References to former President Saparmurat Niyazov continue to be expunged from official Turkmen culture, with the latest de-Niyazovization move covering print media.
The publication previously known as "Nesli Turkmenbashi," or Descendents of Turkmenbashi in English, has been re-fashioned simply as Nesli, the Russian newspaper Izvestia reported January 26. In addition, the latest edition of a womens journal called "Gurbansoltan Eje," in honor of Niyazovs mother, has appeared under a new title, "Zenan Kalby," or Womens Soul.
"During the rule of Saparmurat Niyazov, his name, as well as the names of his close relatives, were used for particular localities, areas, streets, calendar months, periodicals, public organizations, enterprises, culture and health," Izvestia said.
Niayzovs penchant for re-naming things in his honor helped foster his reputation as a megalomaniac. Niyazovs successor, Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov, has erased Niyazovs image from bank notes and eliminated references to him from the national anthem. However, many observers caution that de-Niyazovization campaign may not be emblematic of a dramatic policy shift in the country. Berdymukhamedovs program of reform has so far only dealt with cosmetic issues, not the inherent problems of Turkmenistans closed, autocratic traditions. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
Posted January 26, 2009 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|