|
SAAKASHVILI AND THE NGO SECTOR: TENSIONS OVER HUMAN RIGHTS-RELATED ISSUES
John Mackedon:
8/11/04
Georgia's Rose Revolution is going through a turbulent period.
President Mikheil Saakashvili's efforts to restore Georgia's
territorial integrity have caused tension to rise in the separatist
regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. At the same time, discontent
over Saakashvili's governing style is building in Tbilisi.
International attention is focused on how Saakashvili handles
the challenges presented by South Ossetia and Abkhazia. [For
background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
Less publicized, though no less important for Georgia's democratization
process, is Saakashvili's approach to domestic political dilemmas.
While trying to reestablish Tbilisi's authority in separatist
regions, Saakashvili is simultaneously waging a vigorous domestic
struggle to stamp out corruption and firmly establish the
rule of law. In pursuing those lofty goals, however, critics
contend that the president is using authoritarian means.
Representatives of Georgia's non-governmental sector are
among the most vocal critics of Saakashvili's domestic practices
- an ironic twist given that Saakashvili relied heavily on
the NGO sector in his successful drive to force former president
Eduard Shevardnadze from power last November. A significant
number of top officials now serving in Saakashvili's administration
were prominent civil society actors during the Shevardnadze
era. The presence of such officials in government, however,
has not been able to squelch the concern over the administration's
actions.
An open letter issued in early July by the International
Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) to Javier Solana, a top
European Union official, expressed concern about a "gap"
in the Saakashvili administration's statements on human rights
and its actual practices. The letter went on to voice concern
over recently adopted constitutional amendments "that
have challenged the republican-style balance of powers"
by increasing Saakashvili's authority. It also accused the
Saakashvili administration of various rights violations. To
help support the assertion, the letter cited a July 1 incident
in which security forces used force to break up a sit-in at
Tbilisi City Hall being carried out by earthquake victims
seeking disaster relief.
In addition, FIDH accused Georgian officials of failing to
protect the rights of those accused of crimes. "The increasing
number of [cases of] torture, inhuman and humiliating treatment,
as well as arbitrary detentions also remain matters of deep
concern for FIDH," the letter said.
Controversy has continued to build in August, with Saakashvili
facing accusations of trying to stifle press freedom. An incident
that galvanized presidential critics was the August 2 arrest
of Revaz Okruashvili, the editor of the newspaper Khalkhis
Gazeti, on drug possession charges. Okruashvili's newspaper
has published articles highly critical of Saakashvili's policies.
He was released under a "procedural agreement" reached
between the defendant and Georgian prosecutors, the Kavkasia-Press
news agency reported August 6.
During a public appearance on August 5 in Washington, Saakashvili
rejected criticism about the free-speech climate in Georgia.
[For
background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
In a July interview with the British Broadcasting Corp, Saakashvili
acknowledged the dissatisfaction with his methods, but he
scoffed at the notion that he was taking Georgia in an authoritarian
direction. "Although things are not perfect, we are developing,"
Saakashvili said. "Free media and fair elections rule
out the existence of a dictatorial regime."
At home, Saakashvili has not shied away from confronting
criticism raised by local NGO activists. Referring to the
violent dispersal of the July 1 sit-in, Saakashvili told NGO
representatives in a recent speech that the government had
a right "not to allow the blocking of the entrance of
the Mayor's office…or the paralysis of government entities."
The president did, however, go on to concede that "the
government should not use excessive force to prevent this."
Saakashvili also stressed in the speech that "mechanisms
of cooperation with you [the NGO sector] are a special channel
for us, for our government."
Allegations of improper treatment of prisoners have proven
more problematic for the president. A case that helped stir
the torture controversy involved Sulkhan Molashvili, the former
chairman of the State Audit Agency, who claimed that he was
burned with cigarettes and subjected to electric shocks while
in official custody on corruption charges. Officials have
vehemently denied torturing Molashvili, but NGO representatives
appear to treat the government's statements with skepticism.
"It makes no difference whether or not he [Molashvili]
is guilty, the government should employ all procedural norms,
and this does not include torture," said Zaza Rukhadze,
a representative of the Georgian Young Lawyers Association.
Further complicating the issue, the new Minister of Justice,
Giorgi Papuashvili, abolished a commission responsible for
monitoring conditions in the Georgian penal system. The commission
was created during Saakashvili's stint as justice minister
in Shevardnadze's administration. [For
additional information see the Eurasia Insight archive].
The decision provoked an outcry from NGO activists. "The
former head of the Justice Department in Shevardnadze's regime
[Roland Giligashvili] attempted to abolish this [monitoring
council], but he failed. But Papuashvili was able to do it,"
said Nana Kakabadze, head of the group Former Political Prisoners
for Human Rights and one of Saakashvili's harshest critics.
In an effort to ease the criticism coming from the NGO sector, Saakashvili in early August issued a decree restoring the monitoring council. This commission, comprising 21 members from various NGO and Civil Society groups, will submit quarterly reports to the Justice Ministry and bi-annual reports to the president concerning rights conditions in the country's prison system.
Editor's Note: John Mackedon is a Tbilisi-based writer.
He works for the on-line publicatin Civil Georgia, and formerly
served as a Peace Corps volunteer in the country.

Email this article | Printer-Friendly Version
Posted August 11, 2004
© Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic developments
of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the
Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex
and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
|
 |
 |
|