EURASIA INSIGHT

ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN: OSCE WANTS CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS TO HELP KARABAKH PEACE PROCESS
Haroutiun Khachatrian 4/02/09

Print this article   Email this article

As the talks on Nagorno-Karabakh remain stalemated, diplomats moderating the negotiations recently called on 40 civil society representatives from Armenia, Azerbaijan and the disputed region to make a difference in the peace process.

The Azerbaijani-Armenian Peace Forum, held in Vienna on March 24-27, is the latest in a series of such meetings sponsored by London-based International Alert, a non-governmental group that describes itself as "an international peace-building" organization. International Alert has been involved in the South Caucasus since 1996.

To secure attendees’ interest in trilateral discussions, the three co-chairs of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s Minsk Group, which moderates the Karabakh talks, shared details about the negotiations’ status -- the co-chair’s first such briefing with civil society representatives.

"The status of Nagorno-Karabakh cannot be agreed on now, as both suggested solutions -- international recognition of Karabakh as an independent state, and its return back into Azerbaijan -- are now impossible," France’s Ambassador Bernard Fassier elaborated on March 24. The so-called Madrid Principles, a framework for the negotiations, "are aimed at . . . First, return of the regions around Nagorno-Karabakh [to] the control of Azerbaijan; second: Reaching an agreement about a temporary status of Nagorno-Karabakh."

Fassier’s explanation came as a surprise for many of the Armenian civil society participants present; supporters of ex-president Levon Ter-Petrosian have speculated that President Serzh Sargsyan is close to an agreement with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on Karabakh’s final status that would not be optimal for Armenia.

The co-chairs noted that lingering mutual hostility in Armenia and Azerbaijan is burdening consensus-building efforts. "Our impression is that the two presidents, Sargsyan and Aliyev, are closer to reaching a consensus, than the populations in their [respective] countries are," US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Matthew Bryza, the American co-chairman, said. Bryza called for cooperation between civil society representatives and government officials in improving public support for compromise.

Bryza also expressed optimism about recent developments in relations between Armenia and Turkey, a key Azerbaijani ally that closed its Armenian border in 1993 in response to the war with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. The American diplomat underlined that relations between Armenia and Turkey may normalize soon, which could help Yerevan and Baku reach a "breakthrough" in Karabakh.

With an eye to Moscow’s 2008 war with Georgia over breakaway South Ossetia, Yuri Merzliakov, the Russian co-chairman, also stressed the importance of mutual trust in the South Caucasus region. Merzliakov expressed regret that Azerbaijan had rejected the recent appeal of the co-chairs to remove snipers from the frontline.

The three co-chairmen declined further elaboration about the negotiations. Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk, personal representative of OSCE Chairman-in-Office, and Charalampos Christopoulos, special envoy of the OSCE Chairman-in-office for frozen conflicts, also attended the meeting.

Participants in the forum discussed the possibility of holding mutual visits on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border, as well as online discussions and lectures. Details on such initiatives remain in the works. A final document, adopted without the co-chairmen’s participation, agreed with the Minsk Group that "civil society . . . is insufficiently informed and is misinformed." It added that "language of enmity is used increasingly."

Editor's Note: Haroutiun Khachatrian is a Yerevan-based freelance writer who attended the Azerbaijani-Armenian Peace Forum in Vienna.

Posted April 2, 2009 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org

The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website, meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed debate about the social, political and economic developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a program of the Open Society Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation that promotes the development of open societies around the world by supporting educational, social, and legal reform, and by encouraging alternative approaches to complex and controversial issues. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the position of the Open Society Institute and are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.