Skip to main content
Eurasianet

Main Menu

  • Regions
  • Topics
  • Media
  • About
  • Search
  • Newsletter
  • русский
X

Caucasus

Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia

Central Asia

Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan

Conflict Zones

Abkhazia
Nagorno Karabakh
South Ossetia
Transnistria

Eastern Europe

Belarus
Moldova
Russia
The Baltics
Ukraine

Eurasian Fringe

Afghanistan
China
EU
Iran
Mongolia
Pakistan
Syria
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
X

Academics

Demographics
History
Law
Science

Economics

Agriculture
Banking and Finance
Belt and Road Initiative
Business
EEU
Innovation and Technology
Investment
Mining
Oil and Gas
SCO
Transparency

Politics

Authoritarianism
Cult of Personality
Dissent
Elections
Foreign Policy
Human Rights
Illiberalism
National Identity
Press Freedom
Propaganda
Rule of Law
Soft Power

Security

Arms Sales
Black Sea
Caspian Sea
Conflicts
CSTO
Energy
Narcotics Trafficking
Radicalism

Society

Arts and Culture
Diaspora
Education
Environment
Infrastructure
Interethnic Relations
Language
LGBT
Media
Minorities
Public Health
Religion
Rural Life
Social Media
Values
Women's Rights
X

Visual Stories

Audio
Interactive
Video

Blogs

Tamada Tales
The Bug Pit

Podcasts

Expert Opinions
The Central Asianist
X
You can search using keywords to narrow down the list

After Denunciation, Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace Platform on Shaky Ground

Joshua Kucera May 30, 2017
image Vahan Martirosyan, one of the founders of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace Platform, in a YouTube video in which he denounces the organization as an Azerbaijani government sham.

One of the founders of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace Platform, a Baku-backed initiative ostensibly aiming to bring the peoples of the two warring countries together, has denounced the organization as a sham organized by the Azerbaijani government.

"This so-called peace platform has no connection to the Azerbaijani people and society," said Vahan Martirosyan in an online video published on May 27. "From the beginning, it was created and managed by the Azerbaijan government and security services." 

Martirosyan was one of the three Armenian founders of the platform, which was set up late last year. The endeavor was particularly notable for the fact that it brought several Armenian activists to Azerbaijan, a country that typically denies a visa to anyone whose name ends in -yan. 

That the Platform was a thinly veiled publicity stunt on the part of the Azerbaijani government was never in doubt. The Armenians involved were fringe figures, and espoused views far out of the mainstream of Armenian public opinion.

But the public denunciation of the platform by one of its founders nevertheless comes as an embarrassing blow to Baku, which had promoted the group as evidence that it -- in contrast with Yerevan -- was genuinely interested in the friendship of peoples.

The Platform released a statement following the video's release, saying that it was the result of "pressure from those who don't want peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan and continue the policy of occupation," an apparent reference to the status of Nagorno Karabakh, a de jure part of Azerbaijan that is de facto controlled by Armenian forces. 

Eynulla Fatullayev, the editor in chief of haqqin.az, an Azerbaijani pro-government news website that employed some Armenians connected with the Peace Platform, posted on facebook: "The most important thing is that in the information war, we're taking maximum advantage of these Armenians. Now we no longer need him [Martirosyan]. We'll use new ones and then throw them away. We never forgot that for us, the Armenian is an enemy." A few hours later Fatullayev removed the post, however, and said that it was a "fake."

Martirosyan's statement was indeed curious, and somewhat hard to take entirely at face value. He claims to have "genuinely believed that by means of this [platform] we could establish peace between the two peoples," he said in the video. "However I and several other Armenians, having seen Baku's dirty inner workings, quickly became convinced that the real goal of this project and all of the policies of so-called tolerance was and is only to hide the true face of aggression and totalitarianism."

Whatever the case, it's not too hard to see this as the beginning of the end of the ill-fated platform.

Popular

Kazakhstan: President tells government to step down
Kyrgyzstan: Fighting prejudice one hijab at a time
Leila Saralayeva
Tajikistan causes diplomatic bungle with forced return of government critic
Eurasianet
  • About
  • Team
  • Contribute
  • Republishing
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
Eurasianet © 2018