
Central Asian countries are still eligible to receive used American military equipment from the war in Afghanistan. But it seems they may be losing out in the giveaway to their neighbors to the south: Afghanistan, India, and Pakistan.
At issue are the Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected (MRAP) vehicles, a staple of the Afghanistan war. U.S. officials say that there are 1,600 of them in Afghanistan and that they are willing to give them away to allies. One possible recipient is Uzbekistan; this was apparently on the agenda when a high-level delegation from Tashkent visited Washington in December.
But controversy over the giveaway program spiked last month when the Washington Post published a story saying that Pakistan was among the candidates to receive MRAPs. This resulted in consternation in Afghanistan, where mistrust of Pakistan is strong. And U.S. officials disputed the story. “Our commitment to the Afghan people and the Afghan National Security Forces is unwavering,” said Marine General Joseph Dunford, commander of all U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan.
On Monday, the State Department issued a carefully worded statement about the U.S.'s plans. "U.S. military equipment leaving overland from Afghanistan through Pakistan or via the Northern Distribution Network is part of the overall process of removing equipment as our forces draw down in Afghanistan. We have not and do not intend to transfer this equipment to the governments neighboring Afghanistan."
But that doesn't mean that Uzbekistan (or for that matter, Pakistan) is out of the running. The statement appears only to clarify that the U.S. won't allow neighboring countries to take the MRAPs straight from Afghanistan. "Eligible countries can receive items through the normal EDA process," a State Department official told The Bug Pit, on condition of anonymity. (EDA refers to the Excess Defense Articles program by which the U.S. distributes secondhand military equipment to its needier allies.)
Still, Uzbekistan doesn't appear to be a priority for MRAPs. The Post story noted that Uzbekistan's stock rose as a result of Pakistan's closure of the border to NATO and U.S. military traffic, but that the situation has changed since then -- to Pakistan's advantage:
[T]he U.S.-led coalition was increasingly relying on Uzbekistan to transport equipment and supplies out of Afghanistan because supply routes through Pakistan were partly blocked.
Since then, however, a major Pakistani political party has lifted its blockade of NATO supply routes through the northern part of the country. Since January, there also have been several high-level meetings between U.S. and Pakistani officials over ways to bolster cooperation.
And a recently retired Pentagon official said that the three top candidates to receive the MRAPs are Afghanistan, India, and Pakistan. “Those people in US government who want to support the Pakistani counterinsurgency say we should give [MRAPs] to them; the people who are concerned about the future of Afghanistan, the people who are principally concerned about India say we shouldn’t give [MRAPs] to them,” said David Sedney, deputy assistant secretary of defense for Afghanistan, Pakistan and Central Asia from 2009 to 2013, in an interview with Defense News. “What we’re actually going to do is not clear.”
Joshua Kucera, a senior correspondent, is Eurasianet's former Turkey/Caucasus editor and has written for the site since 2007.
Sign up for Eurasianet's free weekly newsletter. Support Eurasianet: Help keep our journalism open to all, and influenced by none.