Skip to main content

Eurasianet

Main Menu

  • Regions
  • Topics
  • Media
  • About
  • Search
  • Newsletter
  • русский
  • Support us
X

Caucasus

Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia

Central Asia

Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan

Conflict Zones

Abkhazia
Nagorno Karabakh
South Ossetia
Transnistria

Eastern Europe

Belarus
Moldova
Russia
The Baltics
Ukraine

Eurasian Fringe

Afghanistan
China
EU
Iran
Mongolia
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
X

Arts and Culture

Economy

Politics

Kazakhstan 2022 unrest
Kyrgyzstan 2020 unrest

Security

Society

American diplomats in Central Asia
Coronavirus
Student spotlight
X

Visual Stories

Audio
Video

Blogs

Tamada Tales
The Bug Pit

Podcasts

Expert Opinions
The Central Asianist
X
You can search using keywords to narrow down the list.
Central Asia, Kazakhstan

Interview 180: Examining the Oil Boom in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan

Andreas Heinrich asks what are the possible negative consequences of a resource boom on the politics and economy in the Caspian.

Justin Burke, Katya Kumkova Oct 28, 2010

In 1993, Chevron Corporation established a joint venture with the Kazakh government, signing on to a $40 billion commitment over the next 40 years to develop oil extraction in Kazakhstan. The following year, Azerbaijan opened its doors to foreign oil companies with the so-called Contract of the Century that would begin a long path toward building multiple pipelines to supply petroleum to Russia and Europe. With the recent collapse of the Soviet Union, the rush to exploit the Caspian region, the world’s third-largest oil reserve, was on.

Seventeen years later, both Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan have developed booming economies largely dependent on the production of oil and natural gas. While production has slowed in the last year in Azerbaijan, both countries continue to boast of growing GDP figures despite a worldwide economic slowdown. Yet the boom cannot last forever, and with large portions of the population living in poverty in both countries, it is also clear that the recent boom raises many questions, if not problems.

In a recent paper presented at a meeting of the International Council for Central and East European Studies, former Woodrow Wilson Center fellow Andreas Heinrich asks what are the possible negative consequences of a resource boom on the politics and economy in the Caspian. Here, Heinrich, who now works as a researcher at Bremen University’s Institute for East European Studies, answers three questions based on his research.

'Interview 180' features roughly three-minute videos of one-on-one, Q&A sessions with decisions makers, politicians and analysts who provide focused insight on Eurasianet's coverage region. Justin Burke is editor of Eurasianet.

Justin Burke is Eurasianet's publisher. 

Sign up for Eurasianet's free weekly newsletter. Support Eurasianet: Help keep our journalism open to all, and influenced by none.

Related

Uzbekistan president backtracks on constitution to defuse Karakalpakstan tension
Uzbekistan: Unrest-stricken region plunged into information blackout
Uzbekistan’s new constitution: More for Mirziyoyev, less for Karakalpakstan

Popular

Uzbekistan president backtracks on constitution to defuse Karakalpakstan tension
Uzbekistan: Unrest-stricken region plunged into information blackout
Uzbekistan’s new constitution: More for Mirziyoyev, less for Karakalpakstan

Eurasianet

  • About
  • Team
  • Contribute
  • Republishing
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
Eurasianet © 2022