Skip to main content

Eurasianet

Main Menu

  • Regions
  • Topics
  • Media
  • About
  • Search
  • Newsletter
  • русский
  • Support us
X

Caucasus

Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia

Central Asia

Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan

Conflict Zones

Abkhazia
Nagorno Karabakh
South Ossetia

Eastern Europe

Belarus
Moldova
Russia
The Baltics
Ukraine

Eurasian Fringe

Afghanistan
China
EU
Iran
Mongolia
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
X

Environment

Economy

Politics

Kazakhstan's Bloody January 2022
Kyrgyzstan 2020 unrest

Security

Society

American diplomats in Central Asia
Arts and Culture
Coronavirus
Student spotlight
X

Visual Stories

Podcast
Video

Blogs

Tamada Tales
The Bug Pit

Podcasts

EurasiaChat
Expert Opinions
The Central Asianist
X
You can search using keywords to narrow down the list.
Kazakhstan

Judge Rebukes Prosecution in Kazakhstan-Related Corruption Case

Alec Appelbaum Jul 30, 2004

The federal judge in New York presiding over a case involving a merchant banker accused of funneling millions of dollars in bribes to top Kazakhstani officials rebuked prosecutors during a July 29 hearing, criticizing the government for its tardy submission of documents to be reviewed by the judge and defense lawyers. The prosecution's delay, as well as unresolved questions concerning procedural issues, means the trial of the accused, James H. Giffen, will likely be pushed back from its originally scheduled October 4 start date.

In response to a pre-trial motion, US Federal Judge William H. Pauley III ruled that Giffen was entitled to review government documents concerning the case. The US government contends that Giffen violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by facilitating the payment of $78 million into personal accounts controlled by top Kazakhstani officials, in connection with a $1 billion deal between the government and Mobil Oil Corp. [For additional information see the Eurasia Insight archive].

The indictment against Giffen did not identify the government officials. Subsequently they were identified as President Nursultan Nazarbayev and then-prime minister Nurlan Balgimbayev. [For additional information see the Eurasia Insight archive].

Giffen's defense team wants to review the government documents as part of its sweeping contention that Giffen was acting with the knowledge of US national security agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency. The defense has sought to undermine the prosecution's case, arguing that Giffen believed that he was acting as a de facto agent of the American government.

During a June 3 pre-trial hearing, defense attorney William J. Schwartz said US officials sought to take advantage of Giffen's firm ties with Nazarbayev, aiming to gain insight into the policy-making process in the strategically important Central Asian state. "The United States was very interested in exploiting his [Giffen's] closeness [to Nazarbayev and other Kazakhstani officials]," asserted Schwartz. The defense attorney has also sought dismissal of the case on the grounds that US law does not apply to Giffen's actions made on behalf of Kazakhstani officials. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].

Government lawyers submitted the documents at 6:25 pm on July 28, leaving Giffen's attorneys little time for review in advance of the hearing the next day. This, in turn, left Judge Pauley clearly annoyed. The judge announced that he was inclined to postpone the start of the trial in order to give Giffen's defense team ample time to prepare. "It's not likely that we're going to have a trial on October 4," Pauley said.

About 30 minutes after the start of the hearing, Pauley granted a request by prosecutors to close the courtroom on national security grounds. Assistant US Attorney Peter G. Neiman argued that many of the documents open to review by Giffen's lawyers could contain sensitive government information. Prior to the closing of the courtroom, prosecutors and defense lawyers sparred over several procedural matters concerning the trial, including guidelines for the taking of depositions of Swiss citizens and officials. Some of bank accounts into which Giffen allegedly funneled bribes are located in Switzerland.

The Giffen case is connected with a broad corruption scandal, known in Kazakhstan as "Kazakhgate." [For additional information see the Eurasia Insight archive]. Talk of a delay of the Giffen trial would appear to reduce the chances that it could have an impact on Kazakhstan's upcoming parliamentary elections, which are scheduled for September 19.

Alec Appelbaum is a freelance reporter based in New York.

Sign up for Eurasianet's free weekly newsletter. Support Eurasianet: Help keep our journalism open to all, and influenced by none.

Related

Kazakhstan: Swathes of land confiscated from Nazarbayev’s brother ahead of vote
New parties, old rules in Kazakhstan’s parliament-to-be
Kazakhstan studies domesticating endangered saiga antelopes

Popular

Kazakhstan: Swathes of land confiscated from Nazarbayev’s brother ahead of vote
Georgian authorities face backlash over Russian purchases
Nini Gabritchidze
Armenian banks record mega profits, but the economy doesn't feel it
Arshaluis Mgdesyan

Eurasianet

  • About
  • Team
  • Contribute
  • Republishing
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
Eurasianet © 2023