Skip to main content
Eurasianet

Main Menu

  • Regions
  • Topics
  • Media
  • About
  • Search
  • Newsletter
  • русский
X

Caucasus

Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia

Central Asia

Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan

Conflict Zones

Abkhazia
Nagorno Karabakh
South Ossetia
Transnistria

Eastern Europe

Belarus
Moldova
Russia
The Baltics
Ukraine

Eurasian Fringe

Afghanistan
China
EU
Iran
Mongolia
Pakistan
Syria
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
X

Academics

Demographics
History
Law
Science

Economics

Agriculture
Banking and Finance
Belt and Road Initiative
Business
EEU
Innovation and Technology
Investment
Mining
Oil and Gas
SCO
Transparency

Politics

Authoritarianism
Cult of Personality
Dissent
Elections
Foreign Policy
Human Rights
Illiberalism
National Identity
Press Freedom
Propaganda
Rule of Law
Soft Power

Security

Arms Sales
Black Sea
Caspian Sea
Conflicts
CSTO
Energy
Narcotics Trafficking
Radicalism

Society

Arts and Culture
Diaspora
Education
Environment
Infrastructure
Interethnic Relations
Language
LGBT
Media
Minorities
Public Health
Religion
Rural Life
Social Media
Values
Women's Rights
X

Visual Stories

Audio
Interactive
Video

Blogs

Tamada Tales
The Bug Pit

Podcasts

Expert Opinions
The Central Asianist
X
You can search using keywords to narrow down the list

Lobbyists Put Positive Spin on Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan – Report

Joanna Lillis Jan 21, 2015

Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are among the world’s dictatorships benefiting from the services of lobbyists in Europe’s corridors of power, a new report alleges.
 
“Repressive regimes outsourcing their diplomacy to public relations firms, lobbyists, and front groups, is increasingly big business in Europe,” claims the study by the Corporate Europe Observatory, a campaign group that seeks to “challenge the privileged access and influence enjoyed by corporations and their lobby groups in EU policy making.”
 
It singles out the regimes of Nursultan Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan – which uses a host of international PR firms, including that of former British prime minister Tony Blair, to buff its international image – and Islam Karimov of Uzbekistan – which benefits from the services of a powerful European trade lobby with links to the country’s controversial cotton sector – as among the beneficiaries.
 
Nazarbayev’s “strategic use of PR and lobbying, particularly via Tony Blair’s network of influence, has to be one of the most successful examples of a dictator whitewashing his image,” the report claims.
 
Tony Blair Associates says its work for Astana on a multi-million dollar contract since 2011 “focuses on supporting political, economic and social reform.” Critics say it is more about spinning the regime’s atrocious human rights record—including tips on how to handle the international fallout from the fatal shooting of protestors in 2011.
 
Astana – which has stepped up efforts to promote soft power lately – employs a host of PR firms including Portland Communications and BGR Gabara, which “has allowed the country to achieve a series of near-Orwellian high profile successes on the international scene,” the report says.
 
It adds that Astana also harnesses lobbying power through Nazarbayev’s International Advisory Board (consisting of “a veritable club of former European prime ministers,” including Blair, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, and former Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi) and bodies such as the Eurasian Council on Foreign Affairs, a new Brussels-based think-tank that is basically “a front for Kazakhstan.”
 
Meanwhile, Uzbekistan benefits from lobbying through organizations such as the British Uzbek Society and the Uzbek-British Trade and Industry Council (UBTIC).
 
Co-founded by the Uzbek embassy in London and including prominent British MPs as members, the British Uzbek Society bills itself as promoting cooperation in business, education, and the arts. As the report points out, the society’s president, Lord Frederick Ponsonby, is famous for once hailing a parliamentary election in dictatorial Uzbekistan as “independent,” while another member, academic Shirin Akiner, “produced a report that absolved the Karimov regime from responsibility for the 2005 Andijan massacre in which security officials opened fire killing several hundred protesters.”
 
The society’s members include oil companies like Exxon Mobil and Tethys Petroleum, leading the Corporate Europe Observatory to describe it as an “UK-Uzbek friendship association with a whiff of petrol.”
 
Energy companies like BP, Exxon Mobil, and Shell are also members of the UBTIC, a trade association spearheaded by the British and Uzbek governments. Another member is Uzbekistan’s state cotton industry association, Uzpakhtasanoat, and the report highlights UBTIC’s links with Uzbekistan’s controversial cotton sector, “despite the continued coercion by the state of slave child and adult labor in the Uzbekistan cotton harvest.”

Popular

Kazakhstan: Nazarbayev scrambling to be seen acting on growing inequality
Almaz Kumenov
CSTO to remain headless another year – report
Joshua Kucera
Video | China pursues Muslims into shared Kazakhstan trade zone
Eurasianet
  • About
  • Team
  • Contribute
  • Republishing
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
Eurasianet © 2018