Skip to main content

Eurasianet

Main Menu

  • Regions
  • Topics
  • Media
  • About
  • Search
  • Newsletter
  • русский
  • Support us
X

Caucasus

Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia

Central Asia

Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan

Conflict Zones

Abkhazia
Nagorno Karabakh
South Ossetia

Eastern Europe

Belarus
Moldova
Russia
The Baltics
Ukraine

Eurasian Fringe

Afghanistan
China
EU
Iran
Mongolia
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
X

Environment

Economy

Politics

Kazakhstan's Bloody January 2022
Kyrgyzstan 2020 unrest

Security

Society

American diplomats in Central Asia
Arts and Culture
Coronavirus
Student spotlight
X

Visual Stories

Podcast
Video

Blogs

Tamada Tales
The Bug Pit

Podcasts

EurasiaChat
Expert Opinions
The Central Asianist
X
You can search using keywords to narrow down the list.
Georgia, Caucasus

No European solution for Georgian crisis

A second attempt at mediation by an EU diplomat failed to achieve results, as Georgia's western partners are proving unable to help the country's two warring political factions find common ground.

Giorgi Lomsadze Mar 31, 2021
Danielsson EU mediator Christian Danielsson meets with members of Georgia's ruling and opposition parties in Tbilisi. (photo: EU Delegation Georgia)

The European Union’s second attempt to reconcile the Georgian government and opposition has failed, leaving the country stuck in a political crisis that is appearing more and more like a chronic condition.

After eight hours of arduous negotiations on March 30, EU-commissioned mediator Christian Danielsson reported that all sides refused to go along with a proposed solution to the months-long political stalemate that has left the nation’s legislature one-third empty and the two sides engaged more in fighting one another than anything productive.

“I’m sad to report that none of the political parties could agree to this solution in whole,” said Danielsson, an envoy of European Council President Charles Michel, before wrapping up his mission to Georgia.  

Danielsson’s mission was the latest and one of the more high-level attempts by Georgia’s western partners to mediate a solution to the ongoing crisis in the country, which has been festering since the opposition refused to accept the results of controversial parliamentary elections in November.

The government and the opposition rushed to blame one another for the unsuccessful outcome of the effort, the EU point man’s second trip to Georgia this month. “Disrupting the talks was by default the goal of the radical opposition’s leader [ex-president] Mikheil Saakashvili,” said Irakli Kobakhidze, chairman of the governing Georgian Dream Party.

The opposition, meanwhile, put the blame at the feet of Georgian Dream’s founder and de facto leader, billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili. “Ivanishvili and his entourage have not moved away from the nationally destructive position… to retain power and the status quo at any cost,” said Giga Bokeria, of European Georgia party.

Earlier on, one European parliamentarian had proposed that Georgians just cut to the chase and let Ivanishvili and Saakashvili participate in the talks directly. “They are the true leaders of both political parties [Georgian Dream and United National Movement],” said Andrius Kubilius in comments to Georgian media. “The formal leaders involved in the talks don’t understand their responsibility and can’t find a compromise.”

The sides appeared willing to go along with Danielsson’s proposals on reforms to Georgia’s electoral, legislative and judicial systems. But they got hung up on the two most contentious issues pushed by the opposition: snap parliamentary elections and the release of what they call political prisoners, most notably Nika Melia, the chairman of the largest opposition group, the United National Movement.

Danielsson’s proposed roadmap suggested solving the issue of the prisoners as part of a broader amnesty. It did not envisage snap elections, but rather laid out reforms that would help ensure that there are less question marks raised over the electoral process in the future.

There were hopes that high-level involvement of the European Union, which Georgia hopes to join in the future, would force the feuding sides to restore the process of democratic governance that has been derailed since last year’s disputed election.

Michel, who has a reputation of a political crisis manager, himself personally mediated between Georgian political groups during a February 28-March 2 visit to Tbilisi before dispatching Danielsson to continue the work. He then called on all parties to work toward a solution to the crisis that he said is of “great concern” for the bloc, which tightly cooperates with Georgia via its neighborhood policy.

Danielsson, upon heading back to brief President Michel on his mission, said the EU will continue helping Georgia find a way out of the impasse. “It will be naturally up to him [Michel] to decide on the next steps and the timing of such steps,” Danielsson told reporters. Addressing the Georgian people, he said: “I know your level of expectations and I fully share your frustration.”

 

Giorgi Lomsadze is a journalist based in Tbilisi, and author of Tamada Tales.

Sign up for Eurasianet's free weekly newsletter. Support Eurasianet: Help keep our journalism open to all, and influenced by none.

Related

Azerbaijani MP survives shooting
Armenia's drive to recover stolen assets benefits elite businesspeople, not the state
Baku pushes rights of "Western Azerbaijan" in negotiations with Yerevan

Popular

Azerbaijani MP survives shooting
Heydar Isayev
Armenia's drive to recover stolen assets benefits elite businesspeople, not the state
Arshaluis Mgdesyan
Power-hungry Kyrgyzstan to buy electricity from Russia

Eurasianet

  • About
  • Team
  • Contribute
  • Republishing
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
Eurasianet © 2023