X
X

Uzbekistan and the American Myth of “Strategic Patience”

When it comes to authoritarian Uzbekistan’s dismal human rights record, the Obama administration says “strategic patience” should characterize its relationship with Tashkent. But the premise of strategic patience in Uzbekistan’s case is flawed because Tashkent plays by a different set of rules.
 
Uzbekistan is one of the most repressive states on earth. It also happens to be a northern neighbor of Afghanistan, so for most of the 21st century, Tashkent has been as a key cog in the US-led struggle to contain Islamic militants. These days, geopolitical circumstances are changing, yet US policy seems to be lagging behind the times.
 
Nisha Biswal, the US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, summarized the administration’s position on Uzbekistan in a recent interview. US policy should be “the right balance of pressure, partnership, and a certain amount of strategic patience in how change can take place,” Biswal said, without mentioning Washington’s recent gift of hundreds of military vehicles to the Uzbek government.
 

To read the full story

Steve Swerdlow is a Central Asia researcher and Andrew Stroehlein is European media director at Human Rights Watch. HRW receives funding from the New York-based Open Society Foundations. EurasiaNet.org operates under OSF’s auspices.

Uzbekistan and the American Myth of “Strategic Patience”

1 / 1
X
> <