Skip to main content

Eurasianet

Main Menu

  • Regions
  • Topics
  • Media
  • About
  • Search
  • Newsletter
  • русский
  • Support us
X

Caucasus

Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia

Central Asia

Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan

Conflict Zones

Abkhazia
Nagorno Karabakh
South Ossetia

Eastern Europe

Belarus
Moldova
Russia
The Baltics
Ukraine

Eurasian Fringe

Afghanistan
China
EU
Iran
Mongolia
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
X

Environment

Economy

Politics

Kazakhstan's Bloody January 2022
Kyrgyzstan 2020 unrest

Security

Society

American diplomats in Central Asia
Arts and Culture
Coronavirus
Student spotlight
X

Visual Stories

Podcast
Video

Blogs

Tamada Tales
The Bug Pit

Podcasts

EurasiaChat
Expert Opinions
The Central Asianist
X
You can search using keywords to narrow down the list.
South Ossetia, Georgia, Caucasus, Russia

Russia praises South Ossetia’s decision to drop unification referendum

The two sides have promised to continue consultations on “integration,” though that is a buzzword that analysts suggested was a face-saving measure.

Joshua Kucera Jun 1, 2022
Gagloev De facto leader of South Ossetia, Alan Gagloev, gives a speech on May 31. (photo: presidentruo.org)

Moscow has welcomed the decision of the new leadership of South Ossetia to suspend a planned referendum on joining Russia, though the two sides promised to carry out some other unspecified “integration.”

South Ossetia’s newly elected de facto leader, Alan Gagloev, on May 30 formally suspended the implementation of a referendum that his predecessor had called on joining Russia. The measure was taken “recognizing the inadmissibility of a unilateral decision to hold a referendum on questions touching on the rights and interests of the Russian Federation,” Gagloev’s order said.

In the same order, however, Gagloev also appointed members of a commission charged with “immediately carrying out consultations with the Russian side on an entire complex of issues connected with the further integration of the Republic of South Ossetia and the Russian Federation.”

What form that “integration” may take – it is a common buzzword used between Russia and its allies – is unclear. But the order to forego the referendum, at least for now, was unambiguous. And it was welcomed in Moscow.

“Taking into consideration that the initiative of the former president of South Ossetia Anatoliy Bibilov was not coordinated with us, we assess the decision of the new head of state on suspending activities [connected to the referendum] as sensible, and corresponding to the spirit of alliance between our countries,” said Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on May 31.

Bibilov had originally announced his intention to hold a referendum on joining Russia during the heat of an election campaign, and most observers interpreted it as a political gambit aimed at shoring up his flagging support. It failed, however, and Bibilov lost to Gagloev in the May 8 vote. Undeterred, the lame duck Bibilov formally called the referendum days after his loss. That put Gagloev – who had expressed gentle skepticism about the idea during the campaign, as had Moscow itself – in a delicate spot.

“Gagloev, of course, had to observe politesse,” editor of local news website Osnova, Ruslan Totrov, told Caucasian Knot. “He couldn’t allow himself completely incendiary rhetoric, he had to communicate in the limits required of the head of state. That’s why Gagloev found a quite vague formulation, trying to tone things down and minimize the negative impact of the Bibilov referendum affair. So the words about continuing consultations should be interpreted as a diplomatic way to snuff out the idea of a referendum.”

The consultations with Russia may also be a way to get around the fact that, by law, Gagloev can not cancel the referendum but only postpone it for up to three months. On top of that, many Bibilov appointees remain in key positions with authority over the referendum, wrote journalist Murat Gukemukhov at RFE/RL.

“Therefore, Alan Eduardovich [Gagloev] decided to take another route and bring in another player: Moscow. He can thus avoid speculation of the type that Bibilov loves about ‘betrayal of the interests of the nation,’ ‘pro-Georgian politicians in our midst,’ and so on,” Gukemukhov wrote.

“Russia’s participation also should obviously calm the international community, because so far its demonstrative distance from the situation has only strengthened speculations that the Kremlin is behind the referendum and the question is already decided. Now Moscow’s participating in the consultations should eliminate those suspicions,” he argued.

Russia is one of only a handful of countries that recognizes South Ossetia as independent; the rest of the world considers it part of Georgia and does not recognize its government.

Joshua Kucera, a senior correspondent, is Eurasianet's former Turkey/Caucasus editor and has written for the site since 2007.

Sign up for Eurasianet's free weekly newsletter. Support Eurasianet: Help keep our journalism open to all, and influenced by none.

Related

New wave of labor protests hits Georgia
Georgia faces U.S. and European pressure on Russia flights
Georgian authorities face backlash over Russian purchases

Popular

New wave of labor protests hits Georgia
Nini Gabritchidze
Upgrade in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan ties holds promise of trade bonanza
Uzbekistan: Ex-police officer convicted over Nukus events dies 

Eurasianet

  • About
  • Team
  • Contribute
  • Republishing
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
Eurasianet © 2023