Skip to main content

Eurasianet

Main Menu

  • Regions
  • Topics
  • Media
  • About
  • Search
  • Newsletter
  • русский
  • Support us
X

Caucasus

Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia

Central Asia

Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan

Conflict Zones

Abkhazia
Nagorno Karabakh
South Ossetia
Transnistria

Eastern Europe

Belarus
Moldova
Russia
The Baltics
Ukraine

Eurasian Fringe

Afghanistan
China
EU
Iran
Mongolia
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
X

Arts and Culture

Economy

Politics

Kazakhstan 2022 unrest
Kyrgyzstan 2020 unrest

Security

Society

American diplomats in Central Asia
Arts and Culture
Coronavirus
Student spotlight
X

Visual Stories

Audio
Video

Blogs

Tamada Tales
The Bug Pit

Podcasts

Expert Opinions
The Central Asianist
X
You can search using keywords to narrow down the list.

Turkey Chooses Chinese Air Defense System, Rejecting Russian, American, and European Offers

Joshua Kucera Sep 27, 2013
image The Chinese HQ-9 air defense system, just chosen by Turkey. (photo: Jian Kang, Wikimedia Commons)

Turkey has chosen a Chinese air defense system over Russian, American, and European competitors, apparently prioritizing business concerns over the wishes of its allies. Reports Hurriyet Daily News:

Ankara has granted a long-awaited tender for long-range missile and air defense systems to Chinese contenders, dismissing bids from major NATO allies as the United States, France and Italy.

With the decision, announced today following a meeting of the Undersecretariat for Defense Industries' executive council, which is headed by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Ankara has approved the lowest offer despite worries about the Chinese system’s ultimate compatibility with NATO-owned early warning assets.

The Chinese offer of the HQ-9, at $3 billion, was significantly cheaper than the competing U.S. Patriot, Russian S-400, and French-Italian Eurosam Samp-T systems. And perhaps more importantly, China was willing to co-produce the HQ-9 together with Turkey, a key factor for Ankara, which places a high priority on building up its own defense industry.

"China meets the criteria for procurement outlined in Turkish legislation," said Aaron Stein, an Istanbul-based defense analyst, on twitter. Stein pointed to a 1985 law that emphasized "offsets," an increasingly common practice in international defense trade wherein a country that buys military equipment from a large foreign company requires some of the work to be done in the purchasing country. "Raytheon & Lockheed [the U.S. bidders of the Patriot] were NEVER going to give Turkey the tech transfer terms they demand, they were out of the T-Loramids bid a long time ago," Stein continued (T-Loramids is the Turkish name for the air defense system). "Russia would have had to cut the number of batteries to match the Chinese price and the Aster 30 [the Eurosam offer] isn't cheap (though they were offering tech transfer)... that left the HQ-9, which is based on older S-300 technology, and is a capable system. Cheap, tech transfer, and coproduction = Turkey's terms." (Edited slightly to de-Twitterize).

What remains to be seen is what implications this has for Turkey's air defense cooperation with NATO. When reports emerged this summer that the Chinese system was in the lead, NATO officials warned that such a move would create problems for integrating the system into the NATO air defense equipment that is already based in Turkey. Ankara apparently decided those concerns were outweighed by the business advantages of dealing with China. (And just after being blown off by the Chinese-led Shanghai Cooperation Organization.) Now we'll see what the ramifications are.

Joshua Kucera is the Turkey/Caucasus editor at Eurasianet, and author of The Bug Pit.

Sign up for Eurasianet's free weekly newsletter. Support Eurasianet: Help keep our journalism open to all, and influenced by none.

Popular

Armenian border residents wary of opening up to Turkey
Arshaluis Mgdesyan
Chinese cars conquer Kazakhstan as Russian imports end
Almaz Kumenov
Caspian cul-de-sac: How Europe failed to diversify its gas supply
David O'Byrne

Eurasianet

  • About
  • Team
  • Contribute
  • Republishing
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
Eurasianet © 2022