Skip to main content

Eurasianet

Main Menu

  • Regions
  • Topics
  • Media
  • About
  • Search
  • Newsletter
  • русский
  • Support us
X

Caucasus

Armenia
Azerbaijan
Georgia

Central Asia

Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan

Conflict Zones

Abkhazia
Nagorno Karabakh
South Ossetia

Eastern Europe

Belarus
Moldova
Russia
The Baltics
Ukraine

Eurasian Fringe

Afghanistan
China
EU
Iran
Mongolia
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
X

Environment

Economy

Politics

Kazakhstan's Bloody January 2022
Kyrgyzstan 2020 unrest

Security

Society

American diplomats in Central Asia
Arts and Culture
Coronavirus
Student spotlight
X

Visual Stories

Podcast
Video

Blogs

Tamada Tales
The Bug Pit

Podcasts

EurasiaChat
Expert Opinions
The Central Asianist
X
You can search using keywords to narrow down the list.
Tajikistan, Central Asia

UN rights council takes Tajikistan to task

Dushanbe has done nothing to promote healing of wounds left by civil war.

Sep 25, 2024
The Tajik civil war raged from 1992-1997, and the wounds left by the gross human rights violations perpetrated during the war remain deep today. (Courtesy photo) The Tajik civil war raged from 1992-1997, and the wounds left by the gross human rights violations perpetrated during the war remain deep today. (Courtesy photo)

A follow-up report issued recently by the UN General Assembly’s Human Rights Council assails Tajikistan’s government for failing to implement recommendations contained in an earlier survey concerning atrocities committed during the country’s civil war in the mid-1990s.

The follow-up report relates to a mission conducted in 2019 by UN researchers intent on promoting the closure of old societal wounds left by the civil war. Among that mission’s recommendations was the establishment of a “a truth-seeking State policy” and the development of “specific mechanisms, supported by dedicated resources, for dealing with disappearances caused by and related to the civil war.” 

The Tajik civil war ended in 1998 with the signing of a power-sharing agreement between forces loyal to President Emomali Rahmon and an opposition coalition. Over the subsequent decades, Rahmon assiduously consolidated his power to the point that the leading opposition force during the war, the Islamic Renaissance Party, is now officially banned.

The UN council’s Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, which prepared the follow-up assessment and presented it in late September, judged the Tajik government’s lack of commitment to implementing the UN Human Rights Council’s recommendations in unusually harsh terms.

“Based on the information provided, the Working Group finds that Tajikistan has not taken any significant steps to ensure the enjoyment of the right to know the truth and to ensure accountability for enforced disappearances that began during the civil war,” the report states. “No steps have seemingly been taken either to grant measures of reparation for the harm suffered by victims of gross human rights violations.”

“In 2019, the Working Group observed with concern that the wounds left by the violations perpetrated during the civil war remained deep 20 years later, but were intentionally ignored,” the report added. “The Working Group observes with dismay that, five years later, the situation has not changed.”

Sign up for Eurasianet's free weekly newsletter. Support Eurasianet: Help keep our journalism open to all, and influenced by none.

Related

Tajik-Taliban relations slowly warm, but both sides hedge their bets
Restrictions, discrimination do not significantly stem Tajik migration flow to Russia
Eurasia is a significant source of methane emissions – report

Popular

Tajik-Taliban relations slowly warm, but both sides hedge their bets
Alexander Thompson
Armenia: Pashinyan goes into “attack mode” against political rivals
Restrictions, discrimination do not significantly stem Tajik migration flow to Russia

Eurasianet

  • About
  • Team
  • Contribute
  • Republishing
  • Privacy Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
Eurasianet © 2025